Bake v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The right of the claimant to recover in this action is dependent primarily upon proof that the injury alleged was sustained by the employee in the course of his employment, that it arose out of the employment, and that it was accidental in its origin and cause. The only testimony which it is claimed tends to meet this requirement is that of the son of the deceased who, on the morning of the day in question, had taken his father in his automobile to a kitchen on the campus of Oxford College, which is a part of the Miami University, where he was employed, and who, about four o’clock in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weaver v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MerkOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Coutellier v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hill v. SkinnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Gwaltney v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Stough v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Whipp v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.