Legal Opinion

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Merk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1932No. 22821PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff in error herein will be referred to as the defendant, and the defendant in error as the plaintiff, throughout this opinion.

This case arises out of a controversy over an injury sustained by the plaintiff upon a street car of the defendant company. The plaintiff fell upon the step leading down to the pit of the street car, in the proximity of the fare box, which in this case was situated in the middle of the car. The only doors in this type of car are immediately opposite the fare box; one door being the entrance door and the other the exit door. Plaintiff, who was accompanied by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Omberg v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Commonwealth v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Roosa v. Boston Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. State v. BlydenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Yellow Cab Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. State v. ChappellOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API