Legal Opinion

United States v. LD Caulk Company

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 2, 1954No. Civ. 1372PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODNEY, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought by the United States of America under Section 4 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 and 4.

The complaint charges the defendants and a co-conspirator with combining and conspiring to restrain and monopolize trade and commerce in the manufacture and sale of alginate dental impression material, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.

As a result of a pre-trial conference it was seen that there existed no substantial controverted questions of fact, but the issue consisted in the conclusions to be drawn from the admitted…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Connolly v. LabowitzSuperior Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Aldis v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Helen Simmons v. W. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Laitram Corporation v. King Crab, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1965
  5. United States v. Logan Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API