Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Hanlein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the applicants, Henry Hanlein and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term- and entered in the office of the cleric of the county of New York •on the 27th day of September, 1901, directing a reference to determine and report upon a question of fact arising upon a motion to punish a surety upon an undertaking for contempt.

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ingraham, J.:

This proceeding was to punish one Luke Healy for contempt in having executed and justified upon a bond given to procure the discharge of a mechanic’s lien, filed by the petitioners upon certain premises in the city of New York. The petition upon which the application was based alleges that the petitioners had filed a mechanic’s lien for $489 against Thomas McKeone, as owner and contractor, upon premises No. 16 East Seventeenth street, city of New York ; that thereafter a proposed bond executed by the said Thomas McKeone, as principal, and by Luke Healy and William W. Vaughan, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buchholtz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Neal v. GilleranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. In re HammannNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People ex rel. Sand v. Erster Zloczower Kranken Unterstutzung VereinNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wood v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API