Legal Opinion

In re Hammann

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902Published

Application for an order to show cause.

1Opinion of the CourtGildebslebve, J.

On or" about July 2, 1901, the petitioner, Edward Hammann, entered into an agreement with Michael Jacobs, an attorney-at-law, by which the latter agreed to obtain, within thirty days from July 2, 1901, the return of certain notes and stock, together with a full release, from one Asplund, for which services said Jacobs was to receive in advance from Hammann $250; and it was further stipulated that in case of failure to carry out the contract, and obtain the return of the notes, stock, and release, within thirty days, Jacobs was to return to Hammann the said retainer of $250. This agreement was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HanleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API