Legal Opinion

Erzen v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1979No. 77-7730, CA 12922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) appeals the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) that claimant’s injury is compensable. SAIF denied the claim on the ground that claimant was a corporate officer and the employer had not elected coverage for its corporate officers under ORS 656.039. The referee and the Board held claimant was entitled to benefits as a covered workman and ordered SAIF to accept the claim. The issue is whether an officer of a corporation who has not elected coverage under the Act may nevertheless receive benefits as a covered worker.

The employer,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Allen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. SAIF Corp. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API