Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 1995No. 93-12345; CA A85496Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which determined that, under the so-called “dual capacity doctrine,” claimant was a subject worker entitled to compensation. We remand for the Board to determine whether claimant was a bona fide corporate officer and director with a substantial ownership interest in employer, at the time he was injured. ORS 656.027(9).

The Board adopted these findings by the referee:

“Claimant, 31 years of age at hearing, has worked for approximately 7 years at the premises where he was working on July 22,1994 when he sustained a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. SAIF Corp. v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Erzen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API