Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Fracassi v. Karnuth

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 26, 1937No. 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

In my view, the petitioner, in order to sustain his claim to American citizenship, must establish that his grandfather Thomas Fracassi became a naturalized American citizen. A fair construction of the evidence is that Thomas Fracassi came into the United States from Italy in or about 1888. The undisputed record is that Thomas Fracassi filed a declaration of intention on April 6, 1894, in Ramsey county, state of Minnesota, in which county the proofs show that he resided in or about that time. The burden rests upon the petitioner to establish his right to citizenship and'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Volpe v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Bendel v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. United States ex rel. Rizzio v. KenneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. United States ex rel. Parenti v. MartineauDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  2. Doreau v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. KuhnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. United States Ex Rel. Teper v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  5. United States Ex Rel. Chartrand v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API