Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Parenti v. Martineau

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1930No. 3416PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

By a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner seeks to test the validity of a warrant for his deportation to Italy.

The respondent has filed a return to the writ which shows that the petitioner is a native and subject of Italy, and that he arrived in this country about July 1, 1905. The return further shows that on November 20, 1918, the petitioner wa-s found guilty of theft, and sentenced by the judge of the police court for the city of Meriden to the Connecticut Reformatory at Cheshire for an indeterminate period, and remained there for two years; that subsequently,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartos v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. United States ex rel. Ulrich v. KelloggCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  3. United States Ex Rel. Sirtie v. Commissioner of Immigration at Port of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
  2. United States ex rel. Rizzio v. KenneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
  3. United States Ex Rel. Teper v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Roccaforte v. MulcaheyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
  5. United States Ex Rel. Fracassi v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API