Legal Opinion

Pittman Construction Co. v. City of Marietta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 10, 1933No. 9558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment sustaining a demurrer and dismissing a petition praying for equitable relief. The particular relief sought is recovery of $1600 paid to the City of Marietta for property sold at a tax sale, 'assessed under an act of the General Assembly (Ga. Laws 1917, pp. 757-767), and for cancellation of the marshaPs deed conveying the property to the petitioner.

1. A purchaser at a tax sale, as a general rule, does not come within the rule applicable to purchasers bona fide, but rather within the rule of caveat emptor, and is chargeable with knowledge of defects which the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keen v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Methvin v. BexlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. McWhorter v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  4. Saffold v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. HASH PROPERTIES, LLC v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Elder v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Milam v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Milam v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Timpson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API