Saffold v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is manifest from a reading of the first count of this petition that it sets forth no grounds for the intervention of a court of equity in this matter of partition. An application for statutory partition, so far as the facts are shown, would be ample. If in any respect statutory proceedings would not be ample, equity might intervene. The statute provides that equity has jurisdiction in cases of partition, whenever the remedy at law is insufficient, or peculiar circumstances render proceedings in equity more suitable and just. Civil Code, § 5355. But no…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Bass v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Mills v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Burnham v. LynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Pittman Construction Co. v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Lance v. BoroughsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.