Legal Opinion

United States v. James Dee Francis Sheker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1980No. 79-1618PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

James Sheker challenges his conviction for impersonating an agent of the Internal Revenue Service to obtain “a thing of value”, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912. The “thing of value” sought was the whereabouts of a witness against Sheker in a state prosecution. Sheker raises three claims in this appeal: (1) That the information sought was not a “thing of value” under 18 U.S.C. § 912; (2) that his counsel failed to provide him with effective assistance at trial; and (3) that the prejudicial effect of witness Stone’s testimony outweighed its probative value and should not have been received. We…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Ralph G. FaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Pablo AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Albert O'Neal ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API