Legal Opinion

Roscini v. Roscini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 13, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with Memorandum, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The decretal paragraph providing for the wife’s support included a direction that the defendant “pay as additional alimony 12.5 percent of any bonus or additional compensation be may receive in a lump sum ”. This provision should be deleted for the reasons set forth in our decision in Tedrow v. Tedrow (36 A D 2d 686). “ A wife is not entitled to a share of her husband’s income as such nor is there a right to escalation as the husband- prospers but she must have minimum support”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Karlin v. KarlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Goldin v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. McClusky v. McCluskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Provenzano v. ProvenzanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Dunning v. DunningNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API