Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jarosz v. Palmer

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 11, 2000No. 98-P-1062PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the plaintiff’s action against the defendants for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, legal malpractice, and violation of G. L. c. 93A, based upon allegations that the defendants mishandled his legal affairs in the formation of two corporations in which he was a minority stockholder, is barred by the principles of issue preclusion. In a related Superior Court action *835in which the plaintiff had sued the two corporations for wrongful termination of his employment and its majority stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Town of Brookline v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Cousineau v. LarameeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Home Owners Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Northwestern Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Gomes v. Limieux (In Re Limieux)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. Home Depot v. KardasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Klimowicz v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. Pellegrini v. Ne. Univ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API