Legal Opinion

Loretta Fay Beck v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1972No. 71-1330PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant, Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. (Connecticut General), issued a life insurance policy to Jerry D. Beck, who the jury found was not in good health at the time of the delivery of the policy. Connecticut General denied liability on the policy subsequent to the death of Beck, but Mrs. Beck, the beneficiary, sued and recovered on the policy in the court below. We reverse with directions that judgment be entered for Connecticut General.

The usual “good health” clause in a life insurance policy provides that the policy is null and void if the insured is not in good health…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington National Insurance v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Great National Life Insurance v. HulmeTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Texas Prudential Insurance Company v. DillardTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. American National Insurance v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Southern Underwriters v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Company v. Acel Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Assurity Life Insurance v. GroganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API