Abercrombie Et Ux. v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx Mr.
Justice Drew,
This is an equitable proceeding to rescind a contract on the ground that it was procured by fraud. The bill alleged that the plaintiffs were induced to make a contract to buy a business on the representation that the gross business done, in a given period, was about $50,000, which representation was false and fraudulent. After a full hearing the chancellor found there was no misrepresentation and dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.
The defendant was the owner of Longview Lodge, in Fulton County, where she conducted a filling station, restaurant and tourist…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Briggs v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Gorgas v. HertzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Press Publishing Co. v. Reading News AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Eilbert v. FinkbeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Stern v. StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Greggerson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kosin v. Andersen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1947