Legal Opinion

Abercrombie Et Ux. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1937No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx Mr.

Justice Drew,

This is an equitable proceeding to rescind a contract on the ground that it was procured by fraud. The bill alleged that the plaintiffs were induced to make a contract to buy a business on the representation that the gross business done, in a given period, was about $50,000, which representation was false and fraudulent. After a full hearing the chancellor found there was no misrepresentation and dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.

The defendant was the owner of Longview Lodge, in Fulton County, where she conducted a filling station, restaurant and tourist…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briggs v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Gorgas v. HertzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Press Publishing Co. v. Reading News AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Eilbert v. FinkbeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Stern v. StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Greggerson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Kosin v. Andersen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API