Stern v. Stanton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 96, Oct. T., 1897, by-defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1896, No. 291, on verdict for plaintiff. Replevin for goods distrained for rent.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 96, Oct. T., 1897, by-defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1896, No. 291, on verdict for plaintiff. Replevin for goods distrained for rent. Before Collier, P. J. On May 14,1892, William Stanton and Ellen I. Stanton, two of the above named defendants, demised to Danzinger & Company the premises situated at Nos. 42 to 50 Sixth street, and also upon Penn avenue, near Sixth street, in the city of Pittsburg, for the term of five years from April 1, 1893, at the annual rental of §24,000, payable in quarterly instalments of §6,000 each, in advance, on the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice McCollum,
The assignments from the first to the eighth inclusive com*478plain of rulings on offers of evidence. The first and second are based on the admission of evidence, and the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth on the exclusion of it. The evidence objected to and admitted was clearly competent. It related to the dimensions and contents of the leased buildings, and to the offer of the plaintiff to pay a month’s rent. It was unquestionably relevant to the issues of fact raised by the pleadings.
The objections to the evidence offered and excluded were well…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gilbert v. MoodyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Buren v. EberhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Wiser v. Parkway Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Sims v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Daly's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.