Legal Opinion

Brakefield v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

'Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. This suit was begun before a justice of the peace for Canadian county. The bill of particulars charged, that on the 22d day of January, 1894, the defendant carried away and converted to his own use three hundred and fifty bushels of oats, the property of the plaintiff, of the value of $87.50 which was due and unpaid.

Read the full summary

'Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. This suit was begun before a justice of the peace for Canadian county. The bill of particulars charged, that on the 22d day of January, 1894, the defendant carried away and converted to his own use three hundred and fifty bushels of oats, the property of the plaintiff, of the value of $87.50 which was due and unpaid. The defendant answered that in a former action before a justice of the peace, in which Ferguson was plaintiff and Brakefield, the plaintiff here, was defendant, the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

McAtee, J.:

The sole question involved in the case is whether the judgment of the district court against Jackson and the finding of the court that “there exists no joint liability on the part of the co-defendants, Ferguson, Lucas and others, with the defendant Jackson, on the cause of action set forth in the pleadings of the plaintiff,” and by which it was, therefore, by the court “ordered and adjudged that the defendants, Ferguson, Lucas and others, recover their costs herein against the plaintiff”’ is a good defense in this action.

The finding of the court was that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Foster v. Richard BusteedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Rogers v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. City of Detroit v. HoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Billy v. Le Flore County Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Widdows v. KeatonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API