Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Houghton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Debt on an official bond. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The city brought a joint action of debt against John Taylor, Jr., John Taylor, Catharine Dardis, and William Houghton, and counted on an official bond given by John Taylor, Jr., as ward collector, and executed by-the other defendants as his sureties.

Mrs. Dardis pleaded the general issue and denied upon oath the execution of the bond. Houghton also pleaded the general issue and added a notice of defense depending on the validity of the objection taken by Mrs. Dardis.

The only evidence offered was on the part of the city, and from that it appeared conclusively that Mrs. Dardis never executed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballou v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Anderson v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Executors of Livingston v. TremperNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Winslow v. HerrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Mace v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Brakefield v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Larison v. HagerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Penfold v. SlyfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Robicheaux v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API