Legal Opinion
The United States of America v. Hector G. Camacho, the United States of America v. Jose Dolores Raygoza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1976No. 75-1557, 75-1447PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. JAMESON, District Judge.
In a consolidated jury trial appellants were convicted of violations of the Gun Control Act of 1968 — on one count of conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and three substantive counts of the sale and delivery of firearms to nonresidents by appellant Camacho, aided and abetted by appellant Raygoza, 1 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3) and 2. 2 We affirm both convictions.
Factual Background
Camacho is a federally licensed firearms dealer who has a small store in Somerton,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Albert EscalanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Eddie L. Ayers, and Gregory R. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ronald v. CloudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.