Koster v. Koster

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff and cross-defendant from an interlocutory decree of divorce granted defendant and cross-complainant on his cross-complaint. The court found that all of the allegations of the cross-complaint—which alleged extreme cruelty generally—were true.

Appellant first says that the court erred in failing to make specific findings of fact as to cruelty. The contention is *127without merit. (LaMar v. LaMar, 30 Cal.2d 898, 902 [186 P.2d 678]; Melny v. Melny, 90 Cal.App.2d 672, 674 [203 P.2d 588].)

Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings. This claim…