Legal Opinion

Melear v. E. A. Fretz Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1941No. 13075Published

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

On original submission, we affirmed the judgment below for the reason set forth in a per curiam opinion;1 we said: “Appellants sued to recover damages for the conversion of certain chattels, upon which they held a lien to secure an unpaid indebtedness of $125, and interest. Appellee interposed a plea of two years’ limitation, which was sustained by the trial court, and judgment was rendered that appellants take nothing. The appeal is without a statement of facts; but, from the findings, we ascertain that, the conversions took place during the months of May and August, 1936, of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffith & Wedge v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Beaumont Rice Mills v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Beaumont Rice Mills v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API