Legal Opinion
Beaumont Rice Mills v. Dishman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 30, 1934No. 2552PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Appellee J. A. Dishman brought this suit against Geo. A. Dishman and J. C. Dishman to recover upon a past due promissory note in the sum of $4,000, payable to his order, and for foreclosure of a duly registered chattel mortgage upon a certain rice crop and certain personal property given to secure the payment of said note.
In the manner provided by statute, he caused the levy of a writ of sequestration upon 5,070 bags of rice covered by said mortgage, which rice was at the time of the levy of the sequestration writ stored with and in the possession of the American Rice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scaling v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Brunson v. Dawson State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Barron v. San Angelo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Wedig v. San Antonio Brewing Assn.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Nichols v. PaineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oats v. Dublin National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Beaumont Rice Mills v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.