Markle v. Wilbur
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 25, Jan. T., 1900, by-defendants, from decree of C. £\ Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1895, No. 14, on bill in equity in case of George B. Marble, Alvan Marble and Clora Marble v. E. P. Wilbur, John Dreisbacb, William H. Stroll and E. S. Twining, Executors of William Lilly, Deceased, John Marble, Ida Hessenbruch and Herman Hessenbruch, her Husband.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 25, Jan. T., 1900, by-defendants, from decree of C. £\ Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1895, No. 14, on bill in equity in case of George B. Marble, Alvan Marble and Clora Marble v. E. P. Wilbur, John Dreisbacb, William H. Stroll and E. S. Twining, Executors of William Lilly, Deceased, John Marble, Ida Hessenbruch and Herman Hessenbruch, her Husband. Bill in equity for an account of the affairs of the firm of George B. Marble & Co. The affairs of this firm have been previously considered in the following eases: Barber’s Appeal, 182Pa. 378; Hessenbruch’s Appeal, 182 Pa. 393; Marble’s Estate,…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Dean,
We have before us in this case the paper-books; appellants’ alone contains 709 pages of printed testimony and exhibits; there are besides appellees’ paper-book, and supplements on both sides. To make an intelligent decree involved a most thorough examination of all this testimony, of the papers and witnesses.
*461We may note, first, that Alvan Markle is no longer a party plaintiff. After the testimony was all in, and before the court below considered it, he withdrew, substantially, acknowledging he had been mistaken in his complaint; then when the decree he had joined in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hessenbruch v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Clarke v. Slate v. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nick v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Potter v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937