Legal Opinion

Whisman Ex Rel. Whisman v. Rinehart

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1997No. 95-4056PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KORNMANN, District Judge.

Rinehart, Pursley, Cox, Blair, and Jines appeal the district court’s 1 denial of their motion to dismiss this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Whismans filed this action against defendants, juvenile officers and social workers, claiming that defendants violated plaintiffs’ constitutional rights of familial association, denying plaintiffs due process of law. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, contending that plaintiffs’ claims were in essence based upon claims of violation of state laws and, therefore, are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that defendants Rinehart…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heartland Academy Community Church v. WaddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Whisman v. RinehartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Katelyn Webb v. Chelsea SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Dennis v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  5. Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API