Legal Opinion
Dennis v. Board of Education
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 8, 2014No. Civil Action No. GLR-13-3731PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’, Board of Education of Talbot County (the “Board”), Karen Salmon, Lynne Duncan, David Stofa, and Sherry Bowen, Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 3). Plaintiffs, Graham Dennis and Casey Edsall, are suing Defendants for constitutional violations arising from when they suspended Dennis and Edsall for possessing weapons on school property. Having reviewed the pleadings and supporting documents, the Court finds no hearing necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2011). For the reasons outlined below,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Patton v. BickfordKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Ritchie v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Gambrill v. Bd. of Education, Dorchester Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Brown v. Prince George's County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Brummell v. Talbot County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.