Legal Opinion
United States v. Santarsiero
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1983No. S83 Cr. 174-CSHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Defendant Roeco Santarsiero was indicted on charges of violating the federal laws with regard to the production and use of counterfeit credit cards. This opinion addresses defendant’s motions, in advance of trial and pursuant to Rule 12, F.R.Cr.P., for an order suppressing from use in evidence certain items removed by the police from his residences in Arizona and New York. Defendant also seeks the return of certain of the items removed from his New York apartment pursuant to Rule 41(e), F.R.Cr.P. For the reasons stated, defendant’s motions…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Arvinder Singh, Rosanna Cerone and Toni CoonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GomezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. RiosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- United States v. SilvaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- United States v. AcostaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011