Legal Opinion

Misskelly v. Rogers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1986No. WD 38171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERREY, Judge.

Defendants, George and Flora Rogers, appeal from a judgment in a court-tried case awarding plaintiffs, Turner and Beatrice Misskelly, damages of $10,000 on their fraudulent misrepresentation claim and an additional $1,500 for attorney fees. Reversed.

In a court-tried case when the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, this court ordinarily is bound by the trial court’s findings of fact, Murphy v. Car-ron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976); Southgate Bank and Trust Co. v. May, 696 S.W.2d 515, 519 (Mo.App.1985), and they are as follows:

1. That defendant George R. Rogers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Orlann v. LaederichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. McKeehan v. WittelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Arnott v. KruseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. David A. Bernoudy, Nancy v. Bernoudy v. Dura-Bond Concrete Restoration, Inc. Ernest L. Alexander Lee PopovichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Eagle v. SwangerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Faron v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API