Legal Opinion

People v. Mikhail

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1993No. D015931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

On this appeal we determine that at the time of the initial sentencing the trial court was without authority to order the previously unconditionally court-approved guilty plea withdrawn and the reinstatement of the original charges. Under the particular facts of this case, the remedy for the trial court’s error is to reverse the judgment entered after a subsequent jury trial, to reinstate the original guilty plea and to remand for sentencing according to that plea. We explain.

Factual Summary

After a preliminary hearing, Nadir Jamil Mikhail was charged in an information with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gananian v. WagstaffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State v. WarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. State v. GittoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. San Francisco Human Services Agency v. Felicia C.California Court of Appeal · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API