Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1991No. 05-90-00654-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Manuel Carrillo was convicted of unlawful delivery of cocaine. A jury found him guilty of the offense, and the court assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement and a $1000 fine. Carrillo challenges his conviction in three points of error. He alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial based on the prosecutor’s improper jury argument and a police officer’s inadmissible testimony concerning extraneous offenses. For the reasons outlined below, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Detective…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Stahl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. United States v. Aurora Canales and Elia GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Nowlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Ruth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  2. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Pedro Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Pedro Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Pedro Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API