Carrillo v. State

OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Appellant was convicted by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance, and punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty-five years confinement plus a $1,000.00 fine. His conviction was reversed by the Court of Appeals and remanded for a new trial. Carrillo v. State, 821 S.W.2d 697 (Tex.App — Dallas 1991).

The State raises two grounds for review before this Court. After careful consideration, we refuse the petition. However, as is true in every case in which discretionary-review is refused, our refusal does not constitute…