Legal Opinion
Federal Schools, Inc. v. Kuntz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1931No. 13,486PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAGE, Judge ad hoc.
Plaintiff is a foreign corporation engaged in the business of selling correspondence courses in various branches of education. In the course of its business it contracted with a young lady, Miss Geis, domiciled in New Orleans, for the sale and delivery to her of one of the said courses, and the said contract was guaranteed on behalf of Miss Geis by the present defendant, Emma Kuntz. Plaintiff sues Miss Kuntz, the guarantor, for the sum of $150, claimed to be due under the contract. Defendant filed an exception of no cause of action, which, in the court below, was referred…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- James v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- J. Davidson Hill & Co. v. BourcierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Francis v. BarbazonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cazeaux v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Raymond E. Horn, Jr. v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967