Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott v. Newell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 31, 1928No. 12455Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that the special referee has reached the justice of this case, and therefore respectfully dissent from the opposite conclusion announced in the opinion of Mr. Acting Associate Justice Thurmond, for the reasons which follow. The case is quite complicated, and at the risk of repeating what is said in the leading opinion and in the report of the special referee, I shall give my very decided impressions of it.

It appears that one E. A. Simmons, in October, 1921, owned two tracts of land in Williamsburg County, which for convenient reference I shall designate as tract No. 1…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API