Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Wyman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1813PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This was a writ of entry sur disseisin, wherein the said Mary demands against the said Eunice possession of one undivided sixth part of a piece of land in Woburn, in this county; and she counts upon her own seisin within thirty years, and upon a disseisin by the tenant. * October term, 1809, the parties entered into a rule [ *465 ] of court, by which they agreed to submit the action to the determination of Asahel Stearns, Esq., (counsellor of this Court;) and that he should…

Read the full summary

This was a writ of entry sur disseisin, wherein the said Mary demands against the said Eunice possession of one undivided sixth part of a piece of land in Woburn, in this county; and she counts upon her own seisin within thirty years, and upon a disseisin by the tenant. * October term, 1809, the parties entered into a rule [ *465 ] of court, by which they agreed to submit the action to the determination of Asahel Stearns, Esq., (counsellor of this Court;) and that he should have authority to ascertain the increased value of the demanded premises, by virtue of the buildings and improvements…

1Opinion of the Court

Curia.

The award made by the referee in favor of the tenant *460will of course be accepted, unless the facts on which his opinion is - founded, and which he has stated at the request of the parties, show it to be erroneous and unjust.

Without considering the title set up by the demandant, it is evident that whatever right she might have had is barred by the statute of limitations. She made no actual entry on the demanded premises within thirty years after her supposed title accrued ; which is the utmost period allowed, even to a minor.

The questions, whether the entry of a tenant in common is such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Jackson Ex Dem. Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Phillips v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  5. Varick & Bacon v. JacksonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1828

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sydnor v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Fuller v. SwensbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Beall v. McMenemyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API