Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stanaway

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 8, 1991No. Record 910121PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

The dispositive question in this appeal of a civil action for damages is whether an order drafted by the clerk of the trial court and entered by the trial judge, without notice to or endorsement of counsel, memorializing the court’s action taken on the day of entry of the order sustaining a motion to strike the evidence, violated Rule 1:13 thereby rendering the order void.

The Rule, as pertinent, provides:

“Drafts of orders and decrees shall be endorsed by counsel of record, or reasonable notice of the time and place of presenting such drafts together with copies thereof shall be served by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosillo v. WintersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Cofer v. CoferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Walt Robbins, Inc. v. Damon CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  4. State Highway Commissioner v. EasleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  5. Iliff v. RichardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Singh v. MooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  3. Concerned Taxpayers of Brunswick County v. County of BrunswickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  4. James Ex Rel. Duncan v. JamesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Napert v. NapertSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API