Sanborn v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentWintersheimer, Justice
I respectfully but strongly dissent from the majority opinion because the defendant received a fundamentally fair trial and the alleged errors complained of by the majority did not prejudice the verdict of the jury.
The majority decision is a tragic triumph of the so-called system over substance. Every defendant is entitled to a fair trial, *551but not a textbook perfect one. See Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 98 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). A careful and exhaustive evaluation of the record indicates that the principles of law, order and justice which govern our society do not…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.