Legal Opinion

George W. Knowles & Sons v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1903No. 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This case arises under the tariff act of 1890 (Act Oct. 1, 1890, c. 1244, 26 Stat. 567). In September, 1893, the plaintiffs imported 255 tons of Cornish stone, which was first passed free of duty, but was afterwards charged with $3 a ton, under paragraph 98 (26 Stat. 571) as china clay. The importers protested, asserting that the goods were exempt from duty under paragraph 574 (26 Stat. 606) as flint; but the board of general appraisers, while agreeing that the goods were not dutiable, decided that they ought to be classified under paragraph 651 (26 Stat. 607),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. SheaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Louisville Pillow Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API