Legal Opinion

Mercer & Co. v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari. Second application. Practice in superior court. Before Judge Simmons. Bibb superior court. April adjourned term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

This was an application to the court below for a certiorari. The defendant in error had presented a petition for certiorari to the judge, who granted it, and it was dismissed on the ground that the bond was improperly executed ; and within six months from that time, but after the time allowed by law to apply for the writ of certiorari, she applied for a second certiorari, which was granted by the judge. On the trial of the case a motion was made to dismiss the second certiorari, upon the ground that she *496could not, under the circumstances, apply for the certiorari, because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. KelloggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
  2. Grimes v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. McConnell v. Folsom Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Bass v. City of MilledgevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Talley v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. O'Keefe v. CottonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API