Legal Opinion

Moryl v. Ransone

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2013No. 46A04-1112-CT-710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this case of first impression, the appellant-plaintiff Bonnie Moryl, the widow of the deceased, Richard A. Moryl (Richard), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellees-defendants, La Porte Hospital, Dawn For-ney, RN, Wanda Wakeman, RN, B. Prast, RN, and Dr. Carey B. Ransone (collectively, the appellees), when it determined as a matter of law that Moryl’s proposed complaint for medical malpractice was not timely filed with the Indiana Department of Insurance (Department).

Moryl claims that because the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ramsey v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. McGill v. LingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Clary v. National Friction Products, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Miller v. Hague Insurance Agency, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moryl v. RansoneIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bonnie Moryl, as Surviving Spouse and Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard A. Moryl v. Carey B. Ransone, M.D., La Porte Hospital, Dawn Forney, RN, Wanda Wakeman, RN BSBAIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API