Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 16, 2003No. 93A02-0204-EX-312PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Stephen F. Ramsey applied for unemployment benefits after being discharged by Cintas Corporation No. 2 (Cintas). 1 A deputy in the local office of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development determined that Ramsey was entitled to unemployment benefits because Cintas failed to establish that the discharge was for just cause. Cintas appealed this determination and requested a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), arguing that Ramsey violated a written standard of conduct that provided for immediate discharge upon an employee's "Ialbsence of three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stanrail Corp. v. Review Board of the Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Reed Sign Service, Inc. v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Sartain v. BlunckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Moore v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Galvan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kolby O'Banion, Taylor O'Banion, Tim O'Banion, and Kelly O'Banion v. Ford Motor CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.