Legal Opinion
Hagerty v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court which sustained a decision of the unemployment commissioner denying benefits under the act to the plaintiff Hagerty. While his case was before the court, two others raising the same legal questions were then pending. The court, on motion, ordered all three to be consolidated. Rode v. Adley Express Co., 130 Conn. 274, 277, 33 A. 2d 329. From the judgment dismissing the appeals, only Hagerty appealed to this court. The sole question to be determined is whether §§ 1383i and 1389i of the 1947 Supplement to the General Statutes (Rev. 1949, 8§…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kirby v. Board of Fire CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Giammattei v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Rode v. Adley Express Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Siller v. SillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Moore v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Halabi v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Groth v. RedmondConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981