Legal Opinion
Jones v. Hill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 29, 1944No. 31245PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was instituted by Roger Hill, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Arthur Jones, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages for the publication of an alleged slander.
The slander was alleged to consist of the following words:
“Mr. Hill, who is now serving as appointee on our school board, is coming up for election. During his term he has made himself very strongly felt; but in a destructive rather than a constructive way. At the time he went in office, we had a good school. It stood right at the top in the county. Now it is far below par. Throughout the county…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Tulsa Tribune Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Phoenix Printing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Smith v. GillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Franklin v. World Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moraza v. Rexach Racing & Sporting Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
- Nichols v. Bristow Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Crozman v. CallahanDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1955
- Alvarez Camps v. PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Nichols v. Bristow Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.