Legal Opinion

United States v. William Depalma

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1972No. 71-2544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

William DePalma was convicted by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) for the robbery of a Savings & Loan Association in Buena Park, California. The conviction was affirmed by this court on appeal, United States v. DePalma, 414 F.2d 394 (9th Cir. 1969), and the Supreme Court denied certiora-ri, DePalma v. United States, 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 697, 24 L.Ed.2d 690 (1970). Thereafter he sought a new trial upon the grounds of newly discovered evidence known to the prosecutor but not disclosed by him at the trial. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion was denied because the evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. William De PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. John Robert Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Felipe CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. McMullin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. United States v. HearstDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  4. United States v. Felipe CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API