Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Pritchett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1930No. 846PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, O. J.

This appeal is prosecuted by Humble Oil & Refining Company and' four other oil companies from a judgment in favor of O. E. Pritchett ágainst them jointly for the sum of $235, as compensation for damages found to have been sustained by. him on account of injuries to his crops of cotton, corn, and grass caused by an overflow of the waters of Cedar creek. Appellee alleged that appellants operated oil wells in the Powell oil field, from which field surface waters drained into said creek; that they permitted oil to escape from their said wells and mingle with such waters and flow…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Armour & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. v. FitzgeraldTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. City of Corsicana v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance v. FrankumTexas Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API