Galveston, H. & H. R. Co. v. Anderson

The argument of the appellee upon rehearing, although at much greater length than I should myself have written it, so well elaborates my original view on the questions here involved — confirmed as they have been on reconsideration of the cause — that I venture this adoption of it as my further dissenting opinion:

"Was plaintiff's case abated by the act of 1917? If it was, it is wholly immaterial whether the Legislature intended to prohibit railroads from employing children in and about a death-dealing switching yard.

"The opinion of the majority holds that the word `establishment,' as used in…