Legal Opinion

Turner v. Cross and Eddy, Receivers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892No. 7784PublishedCited by 125 opinions

Appeal from district court, Williamson county. Action by S. S. Turner against H. C. Cross and George A. Eddy, as receivers, for damages on account of injuries resulting in the death of her son. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, C. J,

Appellant brought this action to recover damages for an

injury received by her son, which she alleges was caused by the negligence of the receivers, and resulted in his death, and it is agreed that the only question to be decided is: As the law (article 2899, Rev. Civ. St.) stood on the 22d day of December, 1889, is the receiver of a railroad liable as such for injury negligently inflicted upon and resulting in the death of an employe, when the injury is sustained while the railroad is being operated by the receiver? In other words, is the receiver of a railroad operating the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyman v. Central Vermont R. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1886

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GayTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. HanksTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API