Legal Opinion

Peirsoll v. Elliott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1832PublishedCited by 59 opinions

.APPEAL from ..the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky. The facts and pleadings are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of the United States for the seventh circuit and district of Kentucky, dismissing the plaintiffs bill filed in that court, with costs.

The bill states that the plaintiffs are the heirs and representatives of Sarah G-. Elliott, deceased, who departed this life intestate, seised of a valuable estate in the county of Wood-ford, which descended to them. That in her life time, in the year 1813, James Elliott, her husband, caused a. deed to be made and. recorded, purporting- to be executed by the said Sarah G. and himself,- for the purpose of conveying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Lawson v. United States Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API