Mills v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the lower court erred in refusing to allow defense counsel to introduce extrinsic evidence of the victim’s alleged prior inconsistent statements. Because we find that no error occurred we affirm the defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence.
Pursuant to an adverse jury verdict, Ryan Roscha Mills was adjudicated guilty of sexual battery in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (1993). At trial, the victim’s testimony was an important part of the state’s case. After the state rested, Mills’ counsel called a Detective Oterino as a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Caruso v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Gelabert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Robert Roy Macomber v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Collazo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- David Michael Carnright v. The State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024