Legal Opinion

English v. Harris Clay Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

From plaintiffs’ evidence it appears that they bought of Eli Sparks the surface estate in the small parcel of land described in the pleading, subject to a prior grant of the mineral rights therein and right of mining the same, now held through mesne conveyance by the defendant. The exceptions and reservations noted above were intended to protect the prior grant.

The plaintiffs claim that it was not known at the time that there were any minerals on or within the land. They wére, however, put on notice by the exception and reservation that there might be such minerals, and cannot plead, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Griffin v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hall v. Harvey Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Continental Coal Co. v. Connellsville By-Product Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Cole v. Signal Knob Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Nantahala Power and Light Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Gunter by Zeller v. MaherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Alabama Vermiculite Corp. v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API