Legal Opinion

Gunter by Zeller v. Maher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 2019No. COA18-844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Judge.

*345 Rowu Cortez Gunter, by and through his guardian ad litem, and his father, Rowu Gunter, ("Plaintiffs") appeal from an interlocutory order that compels the disclosure of the date on which they first contacted their attorney before the commencement of this litigation. Plaintiffs argue that this date being sought through pre-trial discovery is protected by attorney-client privilege, and they cannot, therefore, be compelled to disclose it. We disagree.

Factual and Procedural Background

On June 23, 2015, Plaintiffs were driving west on Waughtown Street in Winston Salem, North Carolina…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. MurvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Boyd v. Robeson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Blackmon v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Better Health of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  2. Aetna Better Health of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. DaedalusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. DaedalusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API